Description: The first-ever 2013 Dodge... ahem, sorry, force of habit... The first-ever 2013 SRT Viper has been auctioned off for charity over the past weekend, marking the start of sales for the new supercar. The...Add Comments36
Jordan JacksonJun 27, 2012 *cody Mathews: you do realize the GT500 is supercharged right? Only turbos have lag, SC give instant power since they're belt driven
Christopher Helms Jun 26, 2012 Oops I mad a mistake GT500 has a little bit more torque, but still throw a huge supercharger on it and I bet you push a lot bigger numbers
Christopher Helms Jun 26, 2012 If you want the new Viper faster throw a supercharger and turbocharger on it and shut up. Yeah the new 2013 GT500 has more HP but it is supercharged but has less torque. The Viper throws down the most naturally aspirated torque in production today. The new Viper is also lighter and has better handling. Plus you can also tweak the engine to pull out more HP and torque. The Viper would more than lik...
Mario CallirgosJun 26, 2012 Shane was right tho it was faster to 60 faster around the track and had the same top Speed. The new viper should be even faster!
Mikey JimenezJun 26, 2012 Didn't state any facts yourself so you I would be quiet if I was you.
Mikey JimenezJun 26, 2012 @Tin The last gen Viper weighed 400lbs less than the new GT500, it's no slouch when it comes to HP it made 600hp and 560lb/ft of torque, and the suspension isn't from the 60's. It faster to at the 1/4 mile and around the track. I'm sorry Sr. But you
Tin NguyenJun 25, 2012 Shane, this you just make that up? Back up what you say with facts. Do not use your opinion as a fact.
Shane HeidJun 25, 2012 Tin the last viper could destroy the new gt500 in every way, and this one is better
Cham KhievJun 25, 2012 300k for a dodge?.... Uhm no
Mikey JimenezJun 25, 2012 @Tin I understand the money part but reliability? Huh?
Tin NguyenJun 25, 2012 I would still take the new gt500 over this because of reliability and the gt500 is at least $40k less than this viper.
Tin NguyenJun 25, 2012 @patrick I'm not sure if I can agree with you. I would love to see this against the 2013 gt500.
Mikey JimenezJun 25, 2012 @Joe the ZR1 laps the nurburgring @ 7:19 and the ZO6 laps it @ 7:24 both without a big wing, but I agree the Enzo was light years ahead of most supercars at the time.
Cody MatthewsJun 25, 2012 @Shane this is getting all this horse power with out any sort of charging. Means a perfect torque curve. No lagging while waiting for the charger to kick in.
chikenbagJun 25, 2012 @dustin labit- actually, if it weren't for fiat there would be no new viper. chrysler killed it off and when fiat took the reigns, decided they needed a flagship.
Patrick SchalkJun 25, 2012 Shane this Viper will still stomp the GT500 in every way.
Justin RouthJun 25, 2012 It "only" runs a 7:24? Lol funny man over here
Shane JansenJun 25, 2012 Surprised they were comfortable with that little horsepower, you would think they don't want this compared to the 2013 Shelby, a mustang, with a lot more horsepower... I know that's just a small factor but on paper it's weird.
Joe LamoukJun 25, 2012 If you look at the hypercars of 2002-2004, nothing except maybe a Zonda (which was even more expensive than an Enzo), or the MC12 (basically an Enzo with a different body, smaller top speed but faster in the corners) could beat it around the Ring !
Keenan CasteelJun 25, 2012 And Ferrari selected the buyers personally. Anybody can buy a vette or a Viper.
Keenan CasteelJun 25, 2012 @Joe, I like your defense of the Enzo, but they only made 399 of them.
Joe LamoukJun 25, 2012 Why "only" 7:25 ? It's not what you can call a bad performance, especially for a car which wasn't equipped with huge spoilers to generate a lot of downforce as the Viper ACR, the Apollo or the LFA Nur Package.
Jerry ColeJun 25, 2012 but an enzo still only runs a 7:24 at the 'ring. and yeah its a ferrari, and exclusivity and bragging rights and what not, to me thats an ugly car... now an F40.... thats the real masterpiece...
Joe LamoukJun 25, 2012 -> Ashen : of course it did. The Enzo isn't an ordinary Ferrari, just like the F40 or the F50. Only 700 where made, and even if it was released 10 years ago, it's still much quicker than a lot of supercars made nowadays.
Cory DeinesJun 25, 2012 @Ashen: It's not THAT amazing that they pulled 600+hp without using FI. They did have over 8 liters of displacement at their disposal after all.
Crazybonbon OboboJun 25, 2012 Carbuzz made a funny! It was funny actually...
Andrew HubbardJun 25, 2012 From my point of view 300k is fair because you have the FIRST viper and all the money goes to a good cause so its a win win.
Jake MarraJun 25, 2012 Every thimg loses value after a couple years if you pick up a DuPont registry you can but a aston martin, ferrari, or newer porsche for under 90,000 dollars
Stephen Tyler LearnJun 25, 2012 The zr1 cost around 120,000 brand new(at least in the USA) which is about what the viper will cost
Hovie Hov E-HouseJun 25, 2012 I dno about u but the viper sold for a 100 000 while the zr1 sold for 180 000 u still have to pay around 70 000 for a 4 year old viper ... And 70 000 for a 4 year old zr1 chevy loses value out of the factory
Ashen FonsekaJun 25, 2012 Naturally aspirated its amazing 600+ bhp
Dustin LabitJun 25, 2012 They made srt so fiat couldn't have a say in the viper.
Justin KlumppJun 25, 2012 Has dodge basically split up? I have noticed SRT makes their own cars now
Tin NguyenJun 25, 2012 Whoever bought this car never thought of it as an investment. If you look at all the vipers from the past they all depreciate (rather quickly) than appreciate. If you buy a zr1 and park it in the garage for 10 yrs I'm sure true value will go up but
Julian PilinciJun 25, 2012 Investing $300,000 on Catrinel Menghia is more proper business than a Dodge Viper.
Colby ChurchJun 26, 2012 @Dillon I disagree, ZR1 looks meaner. But you're also comparing different generations, wait until the C7 ZR1 before you comment, but this car would look amazing in yellow with black wheels.(: I respect the viper, it's the only car similar to Corvette
Ardavon NazariJun 25, 2012 Looks kinda like the Fisker Karma
Yasser ZahabiJun 25, 2012 I think it's absolutely gorgeous .. I just hope American cars grow out of chrome and go for brushed stainless steel or aluminium .. Never the less .. 10/10 on madness :)
Dillon MageeJun 25, 2012 That is amazing. Far better looking than a ZR1.
John SerelyJun 25, 2012 This looks great, and same here Brian, i cannot wait to see it in person
Brian SnyderJun 25, 2012 @Matt, I agree about the headlights. I was expecting them to be more like the BRZ/fr-s style, cutting sharply towards the center of the front bumper.
Still a beautiful car, can't wait to see it in person.
Tanner MiddletonJun 25, 2012 shoulda had the first one in a different colour. i like them in blue
Matt PiccoloJun 25, 2012 But it's not bad, it's growing on me slowely
Matt PiccoloJun 25, 2012 It's not bad... But idk, there's something odd about the angle that the lights are on, I think they should b angrier if ya know what I mean
Abraham MendozaJun 25, 2012 I think she's worth $300,000. She's magnificent.
Description: Set to retail for about $135,000, the $300,000 bid was quite generous. For the first model, however, it could be seen as a win-win for both the new owner and the Austin Hatcher Foundation for Pediatri...Add Comments5
Jesse DavidsonJun 25, 2012 The start up sounded very weak...
It was a big let down.
Shane JansenJun 25, 2012 Classic, American, engine rumble. Love it.
Ben NortonJun 25, 2012 Glad to see its for a good cause
Qing LiangJun 25, 2012 Classy. Side by side wit a neon Neon.
Description: The Barrett-Jackson Orange County sale in California raised about $560,000 for the charity through the sale of the Viper, a VW Jetta race car and several other pieces of automotive odds and ends.Add Comments1
Patrick JosephJun 25, 2012 A Jetta race car. I'd like to see that.
Kyle KloewerJun 26, 2012 Great job renewing the old
Jon AshleyJun 25, 2012 This thing has 355's in the back, a practically mid-mounted engine, and good weight distribution. It should have plenty of grip if you drive it correctly.
Hovie Hov E-HouseJun 25, 2012 William knows this because he has driven one around the track .....
Jordan JacksonJun 25, 2012 That's a good thing tho, at least for Chrysler it is from a buisness stand point, and those thing were gonna be mandatory anyway
William DownsJun 25, 2012 its not refined they just added electronic aids, turn them off and its still the exact same car that tries to kill u at every turn
Abraham MendozaJun 25, 2012 I think I can finally say that I really want this Viper, others were to crude and hard to live with, but this is so refined and well done. I really hope the Corvette C7 can combat this, but until then...
Matt PiccoloJun 25, 2012 I must say it's growing on me, as when I saw it at first, I hated it... I. Still cant get over tha they ripped off the agera r's headlights but it's still growing on me
Jon AshleyJun 25, 2012 That is what I love most about this new viper. It hasn't really changed. It's evolved into a 21st century car without sacrificing fun.
Wyatt GordonJun 25, 2012 Id paint the carbon the same color as the rest of the car
Chris PenzaJun 25, 2012 I never realized that was made of carbon fiber. It has really grown on me
Kyle AndersonJun 25, 2012 The carbon fibre gives it that much more of a rugged look to the rear, which adds character and I love it.
Stan MitchellJun 25, 2012 Looks like its got a mustache hahah
Justin KlumppJun 25, 2012 I like that they stuck with the badge being a taillight. Gives it just that much more character
Zachary CrowleyJun 25, 2012 @Jordan I was thinking the exact same. It looks very similar to the old ones, just evolved
Jordan JacksonJun 25, 2012 Even tho it's been evolved, from behind, there's no mistaking it, that's a Viper
Tin NguyenJun 25, 2012 Have to disagree with u Matt. I think this rear is better.
Matt PiccoloJun 25, 2012 I like the rear of the old ones better, this is ugly IMO
Colin DzendoletJun 25, 2012 oh yea, glad they left it exposed
Kyle KloewerJun 26, 2012 Haha yeah because you need that when you remember you are sitting in a 640hp viper
Caner OzdemirJun 25, 2012 I like the "Oh Shit" bar for the passenger seat
Kasey CookJun 25, 2012 Hey! It doesn't look like a neon's interior! It's about time.
Ghaith AL-sharariJun 25, 2012 The interior looks really cool but I would choose black over red
Patrick SchalkJun 25, 2012 Yeah. The UConnect system is freakin awesome too. It's so easy to use and the SRT models come with a lot of extra performance stuff in the system. It's amazing.
William DownsJun 25, 2012 love this interior lay out and i wanna hear that radio, harrmon&karrdon in a car gotta sound amazing
Brad HickeyJun 25, 2012 diggin the oh shit handle for the passenger!
Ben NortonJun 25, 2012 What happened to standard shift being standard?
Christian De PriscoJun 25, 2012 Best thing about this car is sitting right in the middle of this picture....the stick!!!
Happy to know they still make cars the "old fashion way" lol
*cody Mathews: you do realize the GT500 is supercharged right? Only turbos have lag, SC give instant power since they're belt driven
Oops I mad a mistake GT500 has a little bit more torque, but still throw a huge supercharger on it and I bet you push a lot bigger numbers
If you want the new Viper faster throw a supercharger and turbocharger on it and shut up. Yeah the new 2013 GT500 has more HP but it is supercharged but has less torque. The Viper throws down the most naturally aspirated torque in production today. The new Viper is also lighter and has better handling. Plus you can also tweak the engine to pull out more HP and torque. The Viper would more than lik...
Shane was right tho it was faster to 60 faster around the track and had the same top Speed. The new viper should be even faster!
Didn't state any facts yourself so you I would be quiet if I was you.
@Tin The last gen Viper weighed 400lbs less than the new GT500, it's no slouch when it comes to HP it made 600hp and 560lb/ft of torque, and the suspension isn't from the 60's. It faster to at the 1/4 mile and around the track. I'm sorry Sr. But you
Shane, this you just make that up? Back up what you say with facts. Do not use your opinion as a fact.
Tin the last viper could destroy the new gt500 in every way, and this one is better
300k for a dodge?.... Uhm no
@Tin I understand the money part but reliability? Huh?
I would still take the new gt500 over this because of reliability and the gt500 is at least $40k less than this viper.
@patrick I'm not sure if I can agree with you. I would love to see this against the 2013 gt500.
@Joe the ZR1 laps the nurburgring @ 7:19 and the ZO6 laps it @ 7:24 both without a big wing, but I agree the Enzo was light years ahead of most supercars at the time.
@Shane this is getting all this horse power with out any sort of charging. Means a perfect torque curve. No lagging while waiting for the charger to kick in.
@dustin labit- actually, if it weren't for fiat there would be no new viper. chrysler killed it off and when fiat took the reigns, decided they needed a flagship.
Shane this Viper will still stomp the GT500 in every way.
It "only" runs a 7:24? Lol funny man over here
Surprised they were comfortable with that little horsepower, you would think they don't want this compared to the 2013 Shelby, a mustang, with a lot more horsepower... I know that's just a small factor but on paper it's weird.
If you look at the hypercars of 2002-2004, nothing except maybe a Zonda (which was even more expensive than an Enzo), or the MC12 (basically an Enzo with a different body, smaller top speed but faster in the corners) could beat it around the Ring !
And Ferrari selected the buyers personally. Anybody can buy a vette or a Viper.
@Joe, I like your defense of the Enzo, but they only made 399 of them.
Why "only" 7:25 ? It's not what you can call a bad performance, especially for a car which wasn't equipped with huge spoilers to generate a lot of downforce as the Viper ACR, the Apollo or the LFA Nur Package.
but an enzo still only runs a 7:24 at the 'ring. and yeah its a ferrari, and exclusivity and bragging rights and what not, to me thats an ugly car... now an F40.... thats the real masterpiece...
-> Ashen : of course it did. The Enzo isn't an ordinary Ferrari, just like the F40 or the F50. Only 700 where made, and even if it was released 10 years ago, it's still much quicker than a lot of supercars made nowadays.
@Ashen: It's not THAT amazing that they pulled 600+hp without using FI. They did have over 8 liters of displacement at their disposal after all.
Carbuzz made a funny! It was funny actually...
From my point of view 300k is fair because you have the FIRST viper and all the money goes to a good cause so its a win win.
Enzo gained value
Every thimg loses value after a couple years if you pick up a DuPont registry you can but a aston martin, ferrari, or newer porsche for under 90,000 dollars
The zr1 cost around 120,000 brand new(at least in the USA) which is about what the viper will cost
I dno about u but the viper sold for a 100 000 while the zr1 sold for 180 000 u still have to pay around 70 000 for a 4 year old viper ... And 70 000 for a 4 year old zr1 chevy loses value out of the factory
Naturally aspirated its amazing 600+ bhp
They made srt so fiat couldn't have a say in the viper.
Has dodge basically split up? I have noticed SRT makes their own cars now
Whoever bought this car never thought of it as an investment. If you look at all the vipers from the past they all depreciate (rather quickly) than appreciate. If you buy a zr1 and park it in the garage for 10 yrs I'm sure true value will go up but
Investing $300,000 on Catrinel Menghia is more proper business than a Dodge Viper.