Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Description: Owner Dmitry Samorukov set a new Moscow Unlim top speed of 251 mph running on VP Q16 fuel. The twin-turbocharged engine can crank out 1,500 hp to its four wheels from its ferocious plant. Even more im...
Add Comments
5
Ya that UR Lamborghini as $109,000 worth of engine work, on top of the price of the car
dought it underground racings twing turbo setup is very reliable been around for a while and they havent blown an engine yet
Does anyone know what a gallardo engine costs? Just curious cause this thing is gonna have to let go eventually.
Description: It's a close one on this week's edition of Drag Race Tuesdays. Can the Boostlogic Nissan GT-R hold off the incredibly powerful Lamborghini Gallardo, or is Underground Racing's twin-turb...
Add Comments
75
Sweet race. I love both cars, but I am in love with the GT-R. Nicely done both races. I kinda saw that comeback happening in the back of my kind
Incredible two of My fave cars awesome race thougt gtr had it cool the gallardo caught back up
That was crazy, that GTR was sick! Giving away 500hp and weighing almost a 1000lbs more than the Gallardo and she's ahead all the way to the last few seconds. The quarter mile, or on the track, the GTR would chew up and shit out that Gallardo.
Why wasting the clutch when you can easily smoke the GTR ? Not worth ...
Awesome race, not bad at all for the GTR considering the 500🐎horse handicap...can't wait for the rematch.
Man I'm really surprised at how many people don't know that the Gallardo is AWD. The Balboni is RWD and I'm not sure but think that the superleggera versions are RWD as well.
I actually stopped the vid with like 15 seconds left cause I thought the gtr had it, then I read the comments...
At the begining im like i want to see the lambo win i see the start , i was like really then at the end omg good race
randy, ferrai makes a car called the ff that is awd with 700 horsepower. most Lamborghinis are awd, the only one I can think.of that isn't is the balboni, I'm not sure about the sv. I know there are older ones like the countach. my point it's a they do make all wheel drive czars and they aren't destroying the gte. I've never seen an ff race a gtr though.
that gtr is sick. such a beautiful launch. lambo and Ferrari got alot of work to do if they wanna match that
gtr still sucked in the quarter... again I'd take it in my evo. trap 128 high tens.
Gallardo is awd. traction is the issue. I get half the 60 ft time in my evo with just under 500 hp.
The GT-R will pretty much always have that good start. It's known that the Gallardo is hard to start or at least harder than GT-R. Even though the GT-R lost it still held its ground with 500hp less.
It's called top end power!!! The only reason that gtr beats half these cars is cause its AWD.... I bet if you made any Ferrari or Lamborghini AWD They would eat that gtr alive
@Alan . How did the lambo "smoke" the nissAn. The Gtr led 99.9% of the time
The reason it starts bad is because of its transmission. The transmission along with that it's RWD makes it vey difficult to get off the line quickly.
I wouldn't call it a bad start. it could've been the turbos. lambo probably had large turbos that only kick in at higher rpms.
I was there that day, the guy in the lambo was getting a bj when the light turned green
Aside from the GT-R probably having more torque, you wouldn't feel the dfference between 1000 hp and 1500 hp until you got up to speed anyway (as was proven) It's all gonna be about the launch with those kinda numbers and the GTR has a better launch
Bad reaction time but, Jesus, he made up for the mistake. pure adrenaline.
I disagree there are several types of drags race but the 1/4 is very important
Well you americans also have miles and miles of highways. I think that's what you only think sean :p
Well I'm in America so the only thing that matters is the 1/4 mile that is what drag racing is not a mile
I was actually surprised the gtr held a lead for that long... But this really wasn't a fair comparison, 1500hp vs 1000, it's obvious who's gunna win....
All of u are wrong ... Go youtube paxton mile with these gallardos ... Its impossible to put 1500 hp down n dangerous on a closed circuit soo these cars dont go into full boosts or even push it till 3rd or 4th
Simple answer the lambo is probably geared for a mile rather than the 1/4. Whereas the GT-R is probably geared towards the 1/4
Isn't 1/4 mile in mid 11s a very bad timing for a 1500 hp??!! I say that gallardo had a very bad driver
.9sec reaction time for the Gallardo? Was the driver asleep? Did he forget why he was on a mile long drag strip? "oh the light's turned green...........now I know I was supposed to do something but what was it? That's it, im meant to set off"
launch control is the only reason the GTR was in front. Gallardo has AWD but doesn't have Launch control. now UGR needs to rollout their Aventador TT and I'm confident it would stroke the GTR from start to finish.
I'm pretty sure the dual clutch transmission would probably efficient in the short run, probably better grip from those tires.
Look at RT lamborghini .5 sec slower but extra 500hp play big roll in top speed
Maybe it's because gtr is a nanny car with awd and Lamborghini is a normal car with rwd?
GTR would win on Any circuit race. And in a quarter mile. And in a half mile race. It's better
1,500 hp v 1,000 hp, not surprised 1500 won. But seriously, it really looked like it wouldn't. So what gives? Bad launch? Too much power at launch? GTR more efficient in use? Hmm
i like to see the GTR looses.. hahaha but yeah.. GTR pawned it in the beginning.. i guess GTR looses out in terms of top speed.
That's where the extra 500hp comes into play includin aerodynamics. Looks like the gtr is packing more torque than the gallardo which good for on the track. I think the gtr would spank the gallardo on any track race
What the hell just took place? The GT-R was busting the Lambo ass in the quarter mile & somehow the Lambo came back in a mile?
Lambo won at the mile marker, but the GT-R destroyed it in the quarter mile with 500 less horsepower. I'm still not sure how that's possible.
if i ever become rich the 1st car im buying is a lambo! or lambos lol
Not my taste but this has to be the best paint job I have seen. Would love to see it in person.
Ha two more runs like that and it wont be the finnish thats on fire.....
All this detailing is amazing, most cars can't pull this off. Great job!!
I would choose a different color for the flames (maybe blue?) just so I wouldn't freak myself out.
I think that if the Lamborghini had 1100 hp, not 1500, both cars would be almost identical.
I got a feeling the Nissan gt-r may start good but the lambos acceleration to 100 or so is better than the Nissan! GOOD LUCK TO THE LAMBO!
Regardless of the end result, I would still go for the GT-R, it's far less flashy
I'm sure that our car will eventually look like planes, being that a subsonic F-4 Phantom 2 has drag coefficient of just .021. Just think a Bugatti or Koenigsegg with that amount of drag could easily brake 300mph
@Mikey, the new Camaro's drag coefficient is .37. The new Corvettes are around .33 to point .34, depending on year on model.
Apparently, the Tesla's Model S has the lowest drag coefficient of any production vehicle, at .24. I guess it needs to be to because of the batteries, wouldn't get to far otherwise.
The new Camaro's are one of the most aero dynamic production cars as well.
Wow, the supra's is .31 for non-turbo models and .32 for turbo models... I never knew how impressive that was O.o
I through the civic in there for a comparison. The GTR has awesome aerodynamics. It slips through the air unlike some that you think would do better, due to there shape, but it's the turbulent air behind the car that causes the most drag.
The GTR is one of the most aerodynamic production vehicles in the world. Here are some drag ratings on some cars. GTR .26 / Maserati Grandsport .34 / Gallardo .35 / Koenigsegg .35 / Diablo .37 / Pagani Zonda .40 and one we all know, Civc Type R .32
the gtr is one of the mostbaero dynamic cars, majority of its development time was spent in the wind tunnel
won't win any drag races. But it will take you to 155 mph and quite a bit beyond while providing strong top end punch, above 6,000 rpm it pulls like a V6. So optimally, a perfect engine would have a bit of both and would pull over a greater range.
Lukas I agree torque is vital but you went too far saying horsepower is meaningless. That's an awfully bold statement. Horsepower is still important for reaching top speed and high end power (especially in NA cars). The little Honda S2000 2.0 motor
Oh hey I don't think I've ever seen a video of anything drag racing a GT-R. Oh wait....
Hmm who'd have thought it a 1000 hp gtr with 1000hp
Not even a 500 hp i4 has around 300 torque maybe, torque is the power hp is how fast it gets put down thats the most simple way to say it so these over built motors that are less than 5l wont have nearly as much low end as a larger motor no mater what the number is which is actualy a good thing for drag races cuz they dont have to roll off the line like a vett to keep up the traction
Im sick of the meaningless Horepower, INCLUDE TORQUE, because horsepower only gives you a clue of what power it might put out in tourques
I was way off for the drag of it but it is better than the lambo http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?/topic/61612-gt-r-aerodynamics-vs-gallardo/
I think it is Jason it's drag rating was at like .93 or more
No way that brick of a Nissan is more aerodynamic than a Lambo.
I havent seen it yet but its not the number its where in the rev range that number is so even a 500ho gap is sermountable and theres no mention of the torque damnit carbuzz google the def. of torque and then start including it in your damn articles
I used to work for boost logic!! Loved that job.
@lee you beat me there. Who writes this stuff.
@ Abraham, I'm pretty sure the gtr is more aerodynamic, it's bigger but that's y I looks how it looks, every bit of it for for the aerodynamics of the car
So it's a 1000hp gtr with 1000hp who would've guessed
This is before I watch the video, and ill say that the Lamborghini would win due to the lighter weight, better aerodyamics, but then again...the dual clutch transmission in the GTR is absolutely quick.