Description: Carroll Shelby and the Ford Mustang have a famous and storied history. The Shelby Cobra is one of the hallmarks of the iconic designer's work and the 1968 GT 350 to this day remains a favorite of...Add Comments13
Graham YoungSep 26, 2012 Yo car buzz once again your incorrect the 1968 GT350 was a HO "hi-po" 289 rated at 306 hp and 335ft-lb
Miguel JimenezSep 25, 2012 My first comment was a little over exaggerated they made closer to 300-350
Miguel JimenezSep 25, 2012 @David They weighed 3,100 pounds.
Miguel JimenezSep 25, 2012 Greg is right. Back in the 60's and 70's cars were measured by gross horsepower and were extremely underrated so this car mostlikley made 350-400HP at the fly wheel.
Greg LewisSep 25, 2012 If you actually believe that it only cranked out 235hp in '68, go back to racing civics! All of the numbers back in the day were lowered for insurance.
Oren BlumensteinSep 25, 2012 and that's it took the boss off the line but fell behind right after that
Oren BlumensteinSep 25, 2012 the boss makes max power and torque high end which means it has to rev up and that takes time
but the shelby is all low end which it gets all its power right of the line. that makes for a quick start
David ParentiSep 25, 2012 The boss can do an 11.7 stock on drag slicks that hook up.
Daniel CoopSep 25, 2012 The BOSS should be in the 12s easily.
David ParentiSep 25, 2012 The 68 should weigh approximately 3300 lbs while the boss weighs about 3600. The boss has far more hp and some more torque than a stock GT 350 , just sayin
Oren BlumensteinSep 25, 2012 you're forgetting that in the60's they only had one thing in mind, drag racing
those mustang weighed more than 1000 lbs leas than the new ones with all bottom end torque
David ParentiSep 25, 2012 That GT350 is not stock to keep up with that boss the way it did. The boss has over 200 more hp compared to the stats on the Shelby and it stayed right there with it.
Description: Pitted against the 2012 Mustang Boss 302 with its 444-horsepower 5.0-liter Coyote engine, one would think the classic Ford wouldn't stand a chance. But that's where one would be wrong.Add Comments20
William DelaneySep 26, 2012 Most of you on here wouldn't even know a real Shelby if it smacked you in the face. Question: what kind of exhaust was put on a sixties Shelby and who put it there?
Phil JohnsonSep 26, 2012 I don't even care if the GT350 lost by a mile, it's still a better looking car
Miguel JimenezSep 25, 2012 Definitely has some upgrades now that I watch the vid.
Tim PreisingerSep 25, 2012 Also most of the times you will find on these cars was with old school tires. Tire technology has come along way. Throw modern day slicks on some of the older cars and you will notice a pretty big difference.
Tim PreisingerSep 25, 2012 David, you can't go by the HP number that cars back then were rated at. They were all under rated. This car realistically probably made another 75 horse or so over what it's rated. However,as Alex said it probably does have a few minor upgrades to it
Colby ChurchSep 25, 2012 Grant and Erick are right, there is no way in hell that 1968 Shelby is stock. If it were, it would be much slower than it already is. It probably has a few minor upgrades with new suspension and soft drag tires. It definitely has over 325hp.
Alex ArvanitisSep 25, 2012 Gt390's trapped 90mph stock. If this car is refreshed, original motor but decent cam, open headers, with jetted carb and on slicks, it'd easily trap 104 and run mid 13's. Solid cars from both generations!
David ParentiSep 25, 2012 The Shelby weighs only 300 lbs less! The boss has 200 more hp and more torque!
The Shelby is not stock, nuff said
Drew StorrustenSep 25, 2012 @tim, completely right. Horsepower to weight ratio people.
David ParentiSep 25, 2012 The Shelby is 300 lbs lighter than the boss. I'm sorry but that Shelby's not original. And probably has a stroker motor judging by the idle. Still cool though. My dad owned a nice 66 gt trunk car with a few mods and it only ran 14s
Tim PreisingerSep 25, 2012 Erick. There are LOTS of people who drag older cars stock. Hell, there are even classes for it...
Erick BernalSep 25, 2012 Guys the Shelby is no way stock. It doesn't even sound close to stock and I'm pretty sure no one will drag race a 44 year old car without some upgrades.
Tim PreisingerSep 25, 2012 It may or may not be stock. But if it isn't stock, I'm pretty sure it only has a few minor upgrades. Remember there is a pretty big difference in weight. It's not JUST horsepower and torque that win races.
Darren NardoSep 25, 2012 Don't think that Shelby was stock either but really cool race non the less !!
Grant CarverSep 25, 2012 Really? The 68 is definitely not stock and definitely not a real shelby car. It's a cool race but you geniuses at car buzz should not represent that car as a stock Shelby gt 350.
Drew StorrustenSep 25, 2012 Yeah ha!!!!!! That was pretty sick. Go classics!!! Good ol' fashioned carbs and maybe a point distributor! :D good run!
Tara FitriaSep 25, 2012 Mustangs have been growing on me.
Tim PreisingerSep 25, 2012 Beautiful GT350. I love to see the old school cars still keeping up with the modern day ones
John M WeishahnSep 25, 2012 Good point, Stephen. Shelby builds very powerful cars, but they're mainly straight line machines. Roush and Boss 302 are way more track capable.
Miguel JimenezSep 25, 2012 The Boss is better than GT IMO!
Tyler TarboxSep 25, 2012 Ok well I guess having a Boss doesn't necessarily mean you can't afford the Shelby. Not the smartest comment by me... Lol
Stephen CobbsSep 25, 2012 Boss 302 is way more track-oriented then the GT500. Nothin to do with price.
Alex SemaanSep 25, 2012 Dylan and Shelby are right for the most part, but i honestly would buy the 302 if i didnt have the money for a shelby haha.
Shelby CassandraSep 25, 2012 @Tyler. I have a white boss 302. I could have bought a Shelby but I opted for one of these. Has nothing to do with the money.
Dylan BruderSep 25, 2012 Different type of customer if you ask me
Tyler TarboxSep 25, 2012 If you can't afford a GT500...
Yo car buzz once again your incorrect the 1968 GT350 was a HO "hi-po" 289 rated at 306 hp and 335ft-lb
The 6cyl weighed 3100 lbs
My first comment was a little over exaggerated they made closer to 300-350
@David They weighed 3,100 pounds.
Greg is right. Back in the 60's and 70's cars were measured by gross horsepower and were extremely underrated so this car mostlikley made 350-400HP at the fly wheel.
If you actually believe that it only cranked out 235hp in '68, go back to racing civics! All of the numbers back in the day were lowered for insurance.
and that's it took the boss off the line but fell behind right after that
the boss makes max power and torque high end which means it has to rev up and that takes time but the shelby is all low end which it gets all its power right of the line. that makes for a quick start
The boss can do an 11.7 stock on drag slicks that hook up.
The BOSS should be in the 12s easily.
The 68 should weigh approximately 3300 lbs while the boss weighs about 3600. The boss has far more hp and some more torque than a stock GT 350 , just sayin
you're forgetting that in the60's they only had one thing in mind, drag racing those mustang weighed more than 1000 lbs leas than the new ones with all bottom end torque
That GT350 is not stock to keep up with that boss the way it did. The boss has over 200 more hp compared to the stats on the Shelby and it stayed right there with it.