Description: If you're keen to snag a future collectible then it's always worthwhile checking out classic car specialist Hagerty Insurance's annual Hot List, which predicts the top ten most collecti...Add Comments2
Duncan AshenhurstFeb 11, 2013 The BRZ will be the most collectible here in NZ, that's for sure...
Ashton SummersFeb 06, 2013 Cool, I have at least one on this list. Might not sell it after all.
Description: The Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Convertible takes the fifth spot on the list for being Chevrolet's "most powerful production convertible ever." Priced at a just under $60k, hardcore enthusiast...Add Comments3
Zachary MaurerFeb 07, 2013 Well, said 69', but I also know the 67-68 is a different style
Brett VincentFeb 07, 2013 I think a Mustang made out of mustard would be a great collectible. I can put it next to my butter Jesus.
Anthony PeruginiFeb 07, 2013 it obviously is styled after the 69. look at the second windows and all the lines. the "gills" behind the door sills. the angle at the front of the hood. that's what they were going for. just like ford did with the mustand
Aj WhiteFeb 07, 2013 @Zachary
It was styled after the 69
Ashton SummersFeb 07, 2013 Well, yeah. It's not pretty, but neither is Burt Reynolds.
Zeus MochaFeb 07, 2013 This is way better looking than the GT500. At least the front. I like the back of the Shelby.
Jacob BurfordFeb 06, 2013 I like it, but the Shelby is always in my mind when I think of this car! Hard choice!
Jordan ParkFeb 06, 2013 I'd take a Shelby GT500 over this all day!
Brandon ChamberlainFeb 06, 2013 Ugly.. Like almost all of GMs products after '75
Zachary MaurerFeb 06, 2013 Erich sounds kinda hurt, I really don't think they were goin for the 67-69' style, I think they wanted to bring back a stang fighter with a very recognizable name. I'm a stang guy, but even I would take this over a gt500
Colby ChurchFeb 06, 2013 Honestly, I don't think they could have done a better job interpreting a modern Camaro with classic styling cues. It looks perfect for what it is.
Description: In fourth place we find the Porsche Cayman S aka "the 911's little brother." The 2013 model is more powerful, efficient and lighter than any other Cayman, and for $63,800 Porsche purist...Add Comments18
Jacob BurfordFeb 06, 2013 Love the new cayman! The only thing stopping me from considering one is the new f-type Jag!
Jacob BurfordFeb 06, 2013 Porsche isn't about how much horsepower they have, it's about the way they use it!
Phaidon ChrisostalisFeb 06, 2013 4,4 is with the sport chrono package which is expensive. Without it 0-60 will be about 5 seconds
Description: At $100 more than the Cayman S, the Audi RS5 is placed third thanks to its classic coupe good looks and impressive performance. Under the hood is a 4.2-liter V8 with 450 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque on ...Add Comments10
Eric DareFeb 06, 2013 Good math carbuzz unless you prices are wrong for this car, this one costs 5100 more
Patrick SchalkFeb 06, 2013 I've driven one of these and they are amazing inside but you can definitely tell the lack of torque.
Luke PurdyFeb 06, 2013 God why is everyone complaining about "ermagherd that's hardly any power!!"?
Jordan SmithFeb 06, 2013 Amen Tim. I love the RS5, I just wish it was torquey-er.
Tyler TarboxFeb 06, 2013 Would take this over the Cayman for sure
Description: The penultimate collector car for 2013 is the Corvette Convertible 427, ideal for enthusiasts underwhelmed by the new Corvette Stingray's styling. Powered by a 7.0-liter V8, the 505-hp 427 specia...Add Comments5
Anthony PeruginiFeb 07, 2013 but why would you sell a beautiful piece of art such as this?
Matthew MoellerFeb 07, 2013 Corvette has one of the worst resale of any sport car, looks on cars.com for corvette ZR-1, there is an entire page of ZR-1s in the $60k range. 40-50% depreciation in 2-3yrs is hardly desirable.
Chris HuffFeb 06, 2013 If i were to buy a c7 i would wait for the 'z06' or 'zr1'. Not sure if they are calling them that
Jimmy BartolottaFeb 06, 2013 It's a convertible Z06 what's not to love? I'd take this over the new C7
Colby ChurchFeb 06, 2013 The 427 Convertible starts out at $75k, but most are over $85k. My local Chevy dealer has 2 of them.
Patrick SchalkFeb 07, 2013 Yeah Anthony, Audi, Porsche, VW, Subaru, and Mini are all American products.
Tim PreisingerFeb 07, 2013 Yeah Anthony, cause the Audi right next to this is American...
Anthony DillonFeb 07, 2013 I'm guessing this is USA list and not a world one
Jimmy BartolottaFeb 07, 2013 @stephen the grand sport had the z06 suspension and brakes. Adding the ls7 that the z06 had makes this essentially a z06 convertible.
Jayce MadridFeb 07, 2013 I saw this Vette the other day. I think the C6s are still cool. They have such a raw feel to them when you drive them, and they look like something classic.
Jacob BurfordFeb 06, 2013 With the new C7 out, the C6 looks even more outdated than it does when there was no C7!
Stephen Tyler LearnFeb 06, 2013 @david no its not. There was never a z06 convertible. This car is basically a grand sport with an ls7 in it. It's collectible because it's limited production and it's the fastest corvette convertible ever made.
David GomezFeb 06, 2013 Isn't this just a rebadged convertible Z06 with a little higher price tag?
Description: Topping the list, pricewise at least, is the $97,395 SRT Viper. Chrysler claims that its 640hp, 600lb-ft 8.4-liter V10 creates "the most torque of any naturally aspirated engine currently produce...Add Comments10
Hunter NolteMar 08, 2013 The engine with most go for NA goes to the zonda R hands down
Patrick SchalkFeb 07, 2013 640hp out of a naturally aspirated engine is nuts.
Jack HowardFeb 06, 2013 Colby it doesn't have the most HP, just torque
Colby ChurchFeb 06, 2013 Not to me mention they are extremely reliable and easier to fix of something does go wrong.
Colby ChurchFeb 06, 2013 @Kyle They definitely don't produce as much horsepower. The Viper has the most horsepower of any naturally aspirated production car. There's proof. Our Pushrod engines may be more simplistic, but they produce amazing power with relative ease.
Dylan BruderFeb 06, 2013 Different behaviors and purposes you can have same numbers but completely different engines
Stephen Tyler LearnFeb 06, 2013 Also the "large" American motors are usually OHV and many of them are lighter than the "smaller" DOHC European engines
Stephen Tyler LearnFeb 06, 2013 You answered your own question when you brought torque into the picture
Kyle KloewerFeb 06, 2013 Why do American engines have such large displacements when smaller engines in European cars produce much more power? (Hp not torque, American engines are known for torque)
Jose CarlosFeb 06, 2013 I just don't think they did enough on the looks department with the time they had. It is just a refreshed viper. It looks old already. Look at the C7, it is stunning, and they did not have years off like the Viper.
Colby ChurchFeb 06, 2013 I agree with Jordan. Corvette looks much better. Headlights are meaner too.
Jordan NishidaFeb 06, 2013 I would take the corvette over this
Luke PurdyFeb 06, 2013 Take this over any version of the corvette anyday
Aiden BassFeb 06, 2013 The Mazda RX-8 produced more hp/L than the Bugatti Veyron... I wouldnt really ever compare those cars
Ashton SummersFeb 06, 2013 A lot of people mistake Torque for HP. Torque is the advantage of a larger ohv engines. High HP/L on an NA engine sacrifices torque. If you want 840hp out of a viper, you can twin turbocharge it, and that engine was designed to handle tuning.
Tim PreisingerFeb 06, 2013 Power to weight is everything... Hp to Liter means absolutely nothing. Also even if a bigger motor makes the same exact power as a smaller one... Chances are the bigger motor will have an advantage over the smaller one. Something called torque.
Josh NegronFeb 06, 2013 Dude, your efficiency argument is pointless when 1) talking about NA and 2) talking about a 640hp ("I think my balls are bigger than yours") SRT Viper...
You wanna talk efficiency, then FI should be your only consideration...
Patrick SchalkFeb 06, 2013 No it's crank hp. I don't think many companies advertise true wheel hp.
Haoliang LiFeb 06, 2013 I don't know but isn't 640hp@wheel?
Patrick SchalkFeb 06, 2013 Marcus you have no idea what you are talking about.
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 It's definitely relevant.... The more efficient the engine the more hp and torque and mpg period...it's not everything but all automakers strive for more hp/l. Is power/weight important? Of course it's the thing....efficiency
Matt PiccoloFeb 06, 2013 I wouldn't say hp/l is totally irrelevant, but it's not that important.
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 Great. I'm only speaking about efficiency not about performance cus obviously the viper produces some great numbers. And it is difficult to compare ohc dohc pushrods and rotary engines as well as forced induction to na, but never the less at 8.4 l
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 Ok so just to clear this up a little. I never said the viper was a lousy sports car I was merely speaking about the efficiency of an engine. My uncle has an srt-10 and it's def a fun car and it's mean and aggressive. I like the new viper it looks
Read MillsFeb 06, 2013 Just saying, but if the HP/L is the best argument, and as another person stated before that companies should be getting 100HP/L, then the Chevy Volt is one of the best sports cars around! At 1.4L it produces 145HP! That's almost 104HP per liter!
Corey Alan KelleyFeb 06, 2013 The BRZ/86 have 100 per liter screw your inefficient SLS!
Michael PageFeb 06, 2013 I agree with Patrick, the hp/L argument goes out the window when comparing pushrods to ohc/dohc engines. Same with rotaries. For example: the 6.2 LS is smaller and lighter (slightly) than a 5.0 coyote.
Josh NegronFeb 06, 2013 Agreed Patrick... Besides... I said it's not ALL about hp/ltr. Of course it factors in--but not all that counts. And no, 90 is not too great if it is all about HP/ltr...
Patrick SchalkFeb 06, 2013 Marcus, just stop right there. Your credibility is already out the window. It is NOT about hp/L. That doesn't have anything to do with anything.
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 The sls is my favorite car and it sits around 90 hp per liter still better than the viper
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 It is about hp per liter brah. As well as power to weight ratio. Also there are plenty of N/A engines that get 100hp per liter which is the new standard in the industry not 75.
Jason BrownFeb 06, 2013 Love the fact Dodge used the big V10. Produces the most torque for a naturally aspirated engine in production. I remember when going up state side, neighbor had a red viper. When the engine purring, you can feel it standing 2 meters away.
Josh NegronFeb 06, 2013 Ummmm... The new Viper doesn't have the most "inefficient" engine anymore, brah...
Plus, that wouldn't be the word I'd use in the first place for NA cars--it's not all about hp/liter--just look at SLS, Z06, or any Aston for starters.
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 The cayman will be as collectible as a 944 is now...lol
Marcus EspinetaFeb 06, 2013 I'll start it I guess...that 8.4 v10 is the most inefficient engine produced today.....in a sports car anyways. And the vette is too mass produced to be a collectible. And the Porsche cayman, really...I don't even have to say anything about that.
The BRZ will be the most collectible here in NZ, that's for sure...
Cool, I have at least one on this list. Might not sell it after all.