2020 GMC Terrain

GMC's Terrain range starts off with the base front-wheel-drive SL at an MSRP of $25,000, exclusive of tax, registration, licensing, and a destination freight charge of $1,195. Next up is the FWD SLE and it costs $28,400. The FWD SLT is a significant step up in standard equipment and it costs $31,200 in 1.5-liter form and $33,045 with the 2.0-liter engine. The fully-loaded Denali AWD variant tops the range and costs a hefty $38,300. All-wheel-drive is available on all models besides the SL and costs an additional $1,600.

With a clear preference for cosseting rather than entertaining, the softly sprung Terrain rides comfortably and makes for an excellent SUV for long-distance driving. Even when opting for pricier models with larger wheels, the Terrain soaks up the majority of surface imperfections and feels composed and refined.

While the steering system is direct and light enough to easily maneuver the SUV around town, it is largely devoid of feedback. The Mazda CX-5, for instance, provides a much more engaging experience. However, for the purposes of transporting a family and their paraphernalia around, the GMC will suit the needs of most owners. Front-wheel-drive is standard and all-wheel-drive is available as an option on all models but the SL. Models equipped with all-wheel-drive can send power to the rear wheels only once the driver has engaged this mode using a console-mounted knob. This process does feel a bit archaic when many rivals will automatically default to all-wheel-drive should slippery conditions be detected. Also proving an annoyance is the button-operated transmission shifter which is tricky to use when executing rapid forward and reverse maneuvers, such as when parallel parking or executing a three-point turn. Overall, the Terrain proves to be an accomplished cruiser but certainly isn't the SUV to buy if sharp dynamics are high on the agenda.

Improved as it may be with more standard safety features, the 2020 GMC Terrain hasn't changed all that much and it fails to excel in any one particular area. This is a problem when stacked up against GM's own Chevrolet Equinox which, although less comfortable, is a better value proposition. While the Terrain rides well, both the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 provide a more rewarding, balanced driving experience, along with superior cargo capacity and interiors that are made from more expensive materials. While the fully-loaded Denali variant can be specified with an array of premium features, it begins knocking on the door of luxury SUVs like the Cadillac XT4 and Lexus NX 300. Far from a dud compact SUV, the Terrain will likely please GMC loyalists with its distinctive styling and rugged feel from behind the wheel, but there are undoubtedly more accomplished competitors in this class.

The most worthwhile option on the Terrain is one you can't see: the 2.0-liter engine. Its added power over the 1.5-liter makes the Terrain a far more pleasant crossover to pilot, so this is the first upgrade we'd recommend. Unfortunately, that rules out both the SL and SLE. The 2.0-liter SLT with front-wheel-drive is, therefore, the sweet spot in the range, as it has enough power and standard features onboard, without feeling shortchanged in any area; additionally, delving into the options list doesn't feel as essential as it does on the cheaper trims. As the Denali's price sees it competing - price-wise - with some luxury SUVs, it's the SLT that works out as the more sensible option.

The GMC's mechanically-similar twin, the Chevrolet Equinox, shares the same pair of turbocharged engines as the Terrain. The result is very similar, too, as the Equinox suffers from poor performance for models using the 1.5-liter engine. Starting at $1,200 less than the equivalent Terrain, the Equinox is lighter on the wallet and maintains this advantage all the way to the top-of-the-range Premier model. Both SUVs offer similar ride and handling characteristics, but the GMC's added cost does present itself in the cabins: it's the Terrain which has a better built and more luxurious-feeling interior, although neither are class-leading in these respects. Although the GMC feels a little more premium, it doesn't feel special enough to justify the extra cost over the Equinox.

GMC's Acadia is a worthy alternative for buyers considering the Terrain. For starters, three of the Acadia's trims can be bought for less than the top-of-the-line Terrain Denali. Of course, with the Acadia's bigger size comes more space for passengers - it can seat either six or seven depending on the chosen seating layout. Cheaper models use a rather lackluster naturally-aspirated engine, but a 2.0-liter turbo and a V6 are also available. Like the Terrain, the Acadia rides comfortably but lags behind key competitors in terms of cargo capacity. The Acadia's cabin is good but not great, offering little more than added interior space over the Terrain's. Still, size counts and the Acadia backs up its extra seating capacity with less rounded, more aggressive styling than the Terrain - if these factors matter to you, it's well worth a look.