Popular Tags Cars

2019 Chevrolet Silverado Turbo Four Continues To Disappoint


Comparing its fuel economy with a V8 makes for grim reading.

While the redesigned 2019 Chevrolet Silverado is a better full-size truck than its predecessor in almost every way, one key feature appears to be somewhat underwhelming. That feature would be the new 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that replaces the previous 4.3-liter V6. Swapping a V6 for a turbo four is nothing new. Just look at Ford. However, we previously reported that the EPA rated the turbo four equipped Silverado with a lower fuel economy than expected, at 20/23/21 mpg city/highway/combined.

And now Car and Driver is reporting this engine returned a not so impressive fuel economy than a similarly equipped 5.3-liter V8 Silverado. The publication conducts its own real-world highway fuel economy testing at 75 mph. By comparison, the EPA tests at only 48 mph.

The EPA also claims the 5.3-liter V8 will return 17/23/21 mpg. After realizing both engines returned similar fuel economy figures, C&D decided to directly compare the two trucks in a 75 mph test. Now, it must be said the two trucks were not entirely identical, save for the engines. The 2.7-liter Silverado was an RST double cab while the 5.3-liter was an RST Crew Cab, which also happened to weigh 314 pounds more. The turbo four Silverado returned 18 mpg and the V8 averaged 21 mpg. Not a big difference.

However, – and here’s the kicker – C&D then conducted the same highway fuel economy test with a 6.2-liter V8-engined GMC Sierra 1500 Denali, paired to an eight-speed automatic transmission.

You Might Also Like
These Are The Cars Billionaires Buy
These Are The Cars Billionaires Buy
Ugliest Crossovers Of The 21st Century
Ugliest Crossovers Of The 21st Century

Lo and behold, it also returned 18 mpg, exactly the same as the 2019 Silverado RST turbo four. For a supposedly more fuel-efficient truck, the 2019 Silverado turbo four isn’t so fuel efficient. In fact, C&D noted that the Ford F-150 Raptor also returned 18 mpg. Only a 2017 Toyota Tundra SR5 with the TRD Off-Road package returned a worse figure, 17 mpg. Given everything, is there any point in buying a turbo four Silverado? Why not just opt for the good old 6.2-liter V8 instead? In this case, there’s no replacement for displacement, fuel economy wise.